A coverage of deeming all assessments in languages apart from the dominant one as unsatisfactory creates a inflexible normal the place numerous linguistic abilities will not be acknowledged. For instance, a multilingual pupil demonstrating proficiency of their native language is perhaps unfairly penalized if that language is not thought-about inside the evaluation framework. This method negates the worth of multilingualism and might discourage language acquisition.
Evaluating linguistic competence solely primarily based on adherence to a single language normal can have detrimental results on people and communities. It could restrict alternatives for these proficient in languages apart from the dominant one, hindering entry to schooling, employment, and civic participation. Traditionally, such insurance policies have been used to suppress minority languages and cultures, selling assimilation and undermining linguistic variety. Recognizing and valuing multilingualism, then again, can enrich society by fostering cross-cultural understanding, selling inclusivity, and increasing entry to world views.
